Change review for rules
I edit the source of truth directly. With many consumers, a rule change needs review.
What's missing
Rule and token changes land the moment I make them. When one person authors and everyone consumes, a bad edit propagates to every session instantly with no second reader.
Why
The whole point of a small owned source of truth is that people can build against it without checking — which means changes to it are the one place that does need a check.
How I'd build it
Put the rules in a reviewed repo: changes go in as proposals, a surface owner approves, a changelog records what changed and why, and breaking changes get a deprecation window before old values stop resolving.
Connected
This thread is scoped to Change review for rules. Opening another node starts a new one.
Ask this node